The classical theory of gender conflict says that in animals with sexual reproduction and traditional sex roles, males compete for females, and in females, competition for partners is weak, since males are always in abundance. This inference follows from the fact that one male can fertilize many females. Accordingly, males are in abundance in the population, and their reproductive success (the number of offspring) increases with the number of partners. For females, this should not be the case: the number of partners does not increase their reproductive success, so they are not chasing the number of partners, but their quality. However, in recent years, both theory and practice show that not only males, but also females can compete for partners, especially in situations where there are many females and few males.
Daphnia alternate parthenogenesis with sexual reproduction. During the period of sexual reproduction, the sex ratio in natural populations can be strongly shifted towards females. Accordingly, questions arise about how many females a male can fertilize and whether females experience a shortage of males, which can lead to reproductive failure and competition of females for males.